[Handbook]( Miranda Rights )

The exact wording of the "Miranda Rights" statement is not specified in the Supreme Court's historic decision. Instead, law enforcement agencies have created a basic set of simple statements that can be read to accused persons prior to any questioning.
Here are examples of the basic "Miranda Rights" statements,

1. You have the right to remain silent.
2. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law.
3. You have the right to have an attorney present now and during any future questioning.
4. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you free of charge if you wish.
5. Do you understand these rights?

But -- You can be arrested without being read your Miranda Rights
The Miranda rights do not protect you from being arrested, only from incriminating yourself during questioning. All police need to legally arrest a person is "probable cause" -- an adequate reason based on facts and events to believe the person has committed a crime.
Police are required to "Read Miranda rights, only before beginning the interrogation of a suspect. While failure to do so may cause any subsequent statements to be thrown out of court, the arrest may still be legal and valid.

Inget, kita harus mastiin suspect mengerti isi dari miranda rights ini.. Kalo dia ngga ngerti, jelasin dengan kata-kata yang gampang. Kalo sampe suspect ternyata sengaja ngulur waktu, tambahin charge 'Resisting Arrest'.

Miranda Rights ini harus di bacain waktu mau di interogasi. Sebelum di bawa ke Los Santos Prison, suspect harus di interogasi apapun itu kesalahan dia.
Kenapa? Karena kita belom tau identitas pelaku, secara detail kita harus tau identitas si pelaku, ini berguna buat charges dia next time & untuk kebutuhan divisi inteligensi. Kalo sampe miranda rights ngga di bacain atau di bacain di HQ, pelaku berhak di lepas dari pertanyaan-pertanyaan polisi yang bersifat introgatif kepada si pelaku selama proses interogasi berlangsung.[/quote]